Please wait a minute...
Submit  |   Chinese  | 
 
Advanced Search
   Home  |  Online Now  |  Current Issue  |  Focus  |  Archive  |  For Authors  |  Journal Information   Open Access  
Submit  |   Chinese  | 
Engineering    2017, Vol. 3 Issue (1) : 136 -143     https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2016.04.011
Research |
Multidecadal Trends in Large-Scale Annual Mean SATa Based on CMIP5 Historical Simulations and Future Projections
Nan Xing1,2,3,Jianping Li1,3(),Lanning Wang1,3
1. College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
2. Beijing Meteorological Observatory, Beijing 100089, China
3. Joint Center for Global Change Studies, Beijing 100875, China
Abstract
Abstract  

Based on observations and Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) results, multidecadal variations and trends in annual mean surface air temperature anomalies (SATa) at global, hemispheric, and hemispheric land and ocean scales in the past and under the future scenarios of two representative concentration pathways (RCPs) are analyzed. Fifteen models are selected based on their performances in capturing the temporal variability, long-term trend, multidecadal variations, and trends in global annual mean SATa. Observational data analysis shows that the multidecadal variations in annual mean SATa of the land and ocean in the northern hemisphere (NH) and of the ocean in the southern hemisphere (SH) are similar to those of the global mean, showing an increase during the 1900-1944 and 1971-2000 periods, and flattening or even cooling during the 1945-1970 and 2001-2013 periods. These observed characteristics are basically reproduced by the models. However, SATa over SH land show an increase during the 1945-1970 period, which differs from the other hemispheric scales, and this feature is not captured well by the models. For the recent hiatus period (2001-2013), the projected trends of BCC-CSM1-1-m, CMCC-CM, GFDL-ESM2M, and NorESM1-ME at the global and hemispheric scales are closest to the observations based on RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios, suggesting that these four models have better projection capability in SATa. Because these four models are better at simulating and projecting the multidecadal trends of SATa, they are selected to analyze future SATa variations at the global and hemispheric scales during the 2006-2099 period. The selected multi-model ensemble (MME) projected trends in annual mean SATa for the globe, NH, and SH under RCP4.5 (RCP8.5) are 0.17 (0.29) °C, 0.22 (0.36) °C, and 0.11 (0.23) °C·decade-1in the 21st century, respectively. These values are significantly lower than the projections of CMIP5 MME without model selection.

Keywords Surface air temperature anomalies (SATa)      Multidecadal trend      Coupled Model Intercomparison Project      Phase 5 (CMIP5)      Projection     
Fund: 
Corresponding Authors: Jianping Li   
Just Accepted Date: 29 November 2016   Online First Date: 13 December 2016    Issue Date: 02 March 2017
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Nan Xing
Jianping Li
Lanning Wang
Cite this article:   
Nan Xing,Jianping Li,Lanning Wang. Multidecadal Trends in Large-Scale Annual Mean SATa Based on CMIP5 Historical Simulations and Future Projections[J]. Engineering, 2017, 3(1): 136 -143 .
URL:  
http://engineering.org.cn/EN/10.1016/J.ENG.2016.04.011     OR     http://engineering.org.cn/EN/Y2017/V3/I1/136
References
1   Alley RB, Berntsen T, Bindoff NL, Chen Z, Chidthaisong A, Friedlingstein P, et al. Summary for policymakers. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, et al., editors Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2007. p. 1–18.
2   Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor MMB, Allen SK, Boschung J, et al, editors. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Working Group I contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2013.
3   Knight J, Kennedy J, Folland C, Harris G, Jones GS, Palmer M, et al. Do global temperature trends over the last decade falsify climate predictions? B Am Meteorol Soc 2009;90(8):S22–3.
4   Li J, Sun C, Jin FF. NAO implicated as a predictor of Northern Hemisphere mean temperature multidecadal variability. Geophys Res Lett 2013;40(20):5497–502.
5   Morice CP, Kennedy JJ, Rayner NA, Jones PD. Quantifying uncertainties in global and regional temperature change using an ensemble of observational estimates: the HadCRUT4 data set. J Geophys Res 2012;117(D8):D08101.
6   Dai A. Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models. Nat Clim Chang 2013;3(1):52–8.
7   Ding Y, Ren G, Zhao Z, Xu Y, Luo Y, Li Q, et al. Detection, causes and projection of climate change over China: an overview of recent progress. Adv Atmos Sci 2007;24(6):954–71.
8   Zhou T, Yu R. Twentieth-century surface air temperature over China and the globe simulated by coupled climate models. J Climate 2006;19(22):5843–58.
9   Stott PA, Tett SF, Jones GS, Allen MR, Mitchell JF, Jenkins GJ. External control of 20th century temperature by natural and anthropogenic forcings. Science 2000;290(5499):2133–7.
10   Knutson TR, Zeng F, Wittenberg AT. Multimodel assessment of regional surface temperature trends: CMIP3 and CMIP5 twentieth-century simulations. J Climate 2013;26(22):8709–43.
11   Jones GS, Stott PA, Christidis N. Attribution of observed historical near-surface temperature variations to anthropogenic and natural causes using CMIP5 simulations. J Geophys Res 2013;118(10):4001–24.
12   Shukla J, DelSole T, Fennessy M, Kinter J, Paolino D. Climate model fidelity and projections of climate change. Geophys Res Lett 2006;33(7):L07702.
13   Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. B Am Meteorol Soc 2012;93(4):485–98.
14   Meinshausen M, Smith SJ, Calvin K, Daniel JS, Kainuma MLT, Lamarque JF, et al. The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300. Climatic Change 2011;109(1-2):213–41.
15   Sen PK. Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall’s tau. J Am Stat Assoc 1968;63(324):1379–89.
16   Mann ME. On smoothing potentially non-stationary climate time series. Geophys Res Lett 2004;31(7):L07214.
17   Vial J, Dufresne JL, Bony S. On the interpretation of inter-model spread in CMIP5 climate sensitivity estimates. Clim Dynam 2013;41(11-12):3339–62.
18   Kosaka Y, Xie SP. Recent global-warming hiatus tied to equatorial Pacific surface cooling. Nature 2013;501(7467):403–7.
19   Zhang L, Ding Y, Wu T, Xin X, Zhang Y, Xu Y. The 21th century annual mean surface air temperature change and the 2?°C warming threshold over the globe and China as projected by the CMIP5 models. Acta Meteorol Sin 2013;71(6):1047–60. Chinese.
20   Mochizuki T, Ishii M, Kimoto M, Chikamoto Y, Watanabe M, Nozawa T, et al. Pacific decadal oscillation hindcasts relevant to near-term climate prediction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107(5):1833–7.
21   Meehl GA, Arblaster JM, Fasullo JT, Hu A, Trenberth KE. Model-based evidence of deep-ocean heat uptake during surface-temperature hiatus periods. Nat Clim Chang 2011;1(7):360–4.
22   Sun C, Li J, Jin FF. A delayed oscillator model for the quasi-periodic multidecadal variability of the NAO. Clim Dynam 2015;45(7-8):2083–99.
Related
[1] Tianjun Zhou,Xiaolong Chen,Bo Wu,Zhun Guo,Yong Sun,Liwei Zou,Wenmin Man,Lixia Zhang,Chao He. A Robustness Analysis of CMIP5 Models over the East Asia-Western North Pacific Domain[J]. Engineering, 2017, 3(5): 773 -778 .
Copyright © 2015 Higher Education Press & Engineering Sciences Press, All Rights Reserved.
京ICP备11030251号-2

 Engineering