Please wait a minute...
Submit  |   Chinese  | 
Advanced Search
   Home  |  Online Now  |  Current Issue  |  Focus  |  Archive  |  For Authors  |  Journal Information   Open Access  
Submit  |   Chinese  | 
Engineering    2016, Vol. 2 Issue (4) : 528 -536
Research |
A Train-Bridge Dynamic Interaction Analysis Method and Its Experimental Validation
Nan Zhang(),Yuan Tian,He Xia
School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China

The train-bridge dynamic interaction problem began with the development of railway technology, and requires an evaluation method for bridge design in order to ensure the safety and stability of the bridge and the running train. This problem is studied using theoretical analysis, numerical simulation, and experimental study. In the train-bridge dynamic interaction system proposed in this paper, the train vehicle model is established by the rigid-body dynamics method, the bridge model is established by the finite element method, and the wheel/rail vertical and lateral interaction are simulated by the corresponding assumption and the Kalker linear creep theory, respectively. Track irregularity, structure deformation, wind load, collision load, structural damage, foundation scouring, and earthquake action are regarded as the excitation for the system. The train-bridge dynamic interaction system is solved by inter-history iteration. A case study of the dynamic response of a CRH380BL high-speed train running through a standard-design bridge in China is discussed. The dynamic responses of the vehicle and of the bridge subsystems are obtained for speeds ranging from 200 km·h-1 to 400 km·h-1, and the vibration mechanism are analyzed.

Keywords Train-bridge dynamic interaction      Wheel/rail relationship      Inter-history iteration      Field measurement      Experimental validation     
Corresponding Authors: Nan Zhang   
Just Accepted Date: 13 December 2016   Online First Date: 23 December 2016    Issue Date: 28 December 2016
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Nan Zhang
Yuan Tian
He Xia
Cite this article:   
Nan Zhang,Yuan Tian,He Xia. A Train-Bridge Dynamic Interaction Analysis Method and Its Experimental Validation[J]. Engineering, 2016, 2(4): 528 -536 .
URL:     OR
1   Xia H, de Roeck G, Goicolea JM. Bridge vibration and controls: new research. New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc; 2012.
2   Zhang N, Xia H. Dynamic analysis of coupled vehicle—bridge system based on inter-system iteration method. Comput Struct 2013;114-115(1):26–34
doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.10.007
3   Yang Y, Yau J. An iterative interacting method for dynamic analysis of the maglev train-guideway/foundation-soil system. Eng Struct 2011;33(3):1013–24
doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.12.024
4   Gao M. Studies on train-track-bridge coupling vibration and train performance on high-speed railway bridges. China Rail Sci 2002;23(2):135–8. Chinese.
5   Zhang M, Zhang N, Xia H. Analysis on wind-vehicle-bridge dynamic interaction for lonf-span railway suspension bridge. China Rail Sci 2013;34(4):14–21. Chinese.
6   Chen Z, Sun Y, Zhai W. Mapping relationship between pier settlement and rail deformation of high-speed railways—part (I): the unit slab track system. Sci Sinica Tech 2014;44(7):770–7. Chinese.
7   Chen Z, Sun Y, Zhai W. Mapping relationship between pier settlement and rail deformation of high-speed railways—part (II): the longitudinal connected ballastless track system. Sci Sinica Tech 2014;44(7):778–85. Chinese.
8   Wang K. Study on high speed train running safety under bridge additional deformation [dissertation]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University; 2015. Chinese.
9   Guo W, Xia H, Xu Y. Running safety analysis of a train on the Tsing Ma Bridge under turbulent winds. Earthquake Eng Eng Vib 2010;9(3):307–18
doi: 10.1007/s11803-010-0015-3
10   Li Y, Hu P, Xu Y, Zhang M, Liao H. Wind loads on a moving vehicle-bridge deck system by wind-tunnel model test. Wind Struct 2014;19(2):145–67
doi: 10.12989/was.2014.19.2.145
11   Xu Y, Zhang N, Xia H. Vibration of coupled train and cable-stayed bridge system in cross wind. Eng Struct 2004;26(10):1389–406
doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.05.005
12   Li X, Liu X, Liu D. Coupled vibration analysis of a railway continuous rigid-frame bridge and vehicles with soil-structure interaction. J Vib Shock 2011;30(12):54–8. Chinese.
13   Li K, Zhang N, Fang X, Tian Y, Xia H. Dynamic analysis of a vehicle-bridge coupled system considering river scouring. J Vib Shock 2014;33(19):40–7. Chinese.
14   Yau J, Frýba L. Response of suspended beams due to moving loads and vertical seismic ground excitations. Eng Struct 2007;29(12):3255–62
doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.10.001
15   Du X, Xu Y, Xia H. Dynamic interaction of bridge-train system under non-uniform seismic ground motion. Earthquake Eng Struct 2012;41(1):139–57
doi: 10.1002/eqe.1122
16   Chen L, Zhang N, Jiang L, Zeng Z, Chen G, Guo W. Near-fault directivity pulse-like ground motion effect on high-speed railway bridge. J Cent South Univ 2014;21(6): 2425–36
doi: 10.1007/s11771-014-2196-9
[1] Zhuo Cheng, Lang Qin, Jonathan A. Fan, Liang-Shih Fan. New Insight into the Development of Oxygen Carrier Materials for Chemical Looping Systems[J]. Engineering, 2018, 4(3): 343 -351 .
[2] Jennifer A. Clark, Erik E. Santiso. Carbon Sequestration through CO2 Foam-Enhanced Oil Recovery: A Green Chemistry Perspective[J]. Engineering, 2018, 4(3): 336 -342 .
[3] Andrea Di Maria, Karel Van Acker. Turning Industrial Residues into Resources: An Environmental Impact Assessment of Goethite Valorization[J]. Engineering, 2018, 4(3): 421 -429 .
[4] Lance A. Davis. Falcon Heavy[J]. Engineering, 2018, 4(3): 300 .
[5] Augusta Maria Paci. A Research and Innovation Policy for Sustainable S&T: A Comment on the Essay ‘‘Exploring the Logic and Landscape of the Knowledge System”[J]. Engineering, 2018, 4(3): 306 -308 .
[6] Ning Duan. When Will Speed of Progress in Green Science and Technology Exceed that of Resource Exploitation and Pollutant Generation?[J]. Engineering, 2018, 4(3): 299 .
[7] Jian-guo Li, Kai Zhan. Intelligent Mining Technology for an Underground Metal Mine Based on Unmanned Equipment[J]. Engineering, 2018, 4(3): 381 -391 .
[8] Veena Sahajwalla. Green Processes: Transforming Waste into Valuable Resources[J]. Engineering, 2018, 4(3): 309 -310 .
[9] Junye Wang, Hualin Wang, Yi Fan. Techno-Economic Challenges of Fuel Cell Commercialization[J]. Engineering, 2018, 4(3): 352 -360 .
[10] Raymond RedCorn, Samira Fatemi, Abigail S. Engelberth. Comparing End-Use Potential for Industrial Food-Waste Sources[J]. Engineering, 2018, 4(3): 371 -380 .
[11] Ning Duan, Linhua Jiang, Fuyuan Xu, Ge Zhang. A Non-Contact Original-State Online Real-Time Monitoring Method for Complex Liquids in Industrial Processes[J]. Engineering, 2018, 4(3): 392 -397 .
[12] Keith E. Gubbins, Kai Gu, Liangliang Huang, Yun Long, J. Matthew Mansell, Erik E. Santiso, Kaihang Shi, Małgorzata Ś liwińska-Bartkowiak, Deepti Srivastava. Surface-Driven High-Pressure Processing[J]. Engineering, 2018, 4(3): 311 -320 .
[13] Steff Van Loy, Koen Binnemans, Tom Van Gerven. Mechanochemical-Assisted Leaching of Lamp Phosphors: A Green Engineering Approach for Rare-Earth Recovery[J]. Engineering, 2018, 4(3): 398 -405 .
[14] Robert S. Weber, Johnathan E. Holladay. Modularized Production of Value-Added Products and Fuels from Distributed Waste Carbon-Rich Feedstocks[J]. Engineering, 2018, 4(3): 330 -335 .
[15] Hualin Wang, Pengbo Fu, Jianping Li, Yuan Huang, Ying Zhao, Lai Jiang, Xiangchen Fang, Tao Yang, Zhaohui Huang, Cheng Huang. Separation-and-Recovery Technology for Organic Waste Liquid with a High Concentration of Inorganic Particles[J]. Engineering, 2018, 4(3): 406 -415 .
Copyright © 2015 Higher Education Press & Engineering Sciences Press, All Rights Reserved.