Please wait a minute...
Submit  |   Chinese  | 
 
Advanced Search
   Home  |  Online Now  |  Current Issue  |  Focus  |  Archive  |  For Authors  |  Journal Information   Open Access  
Submit  |   Chinese  | 
Engineering    2017, Vol. 3 Issue (4) : 477 -484     DOI: 10.1016/J.ENG.2017.04.014
Research |
CCS Research Development and Deployment in a Clean Energy Future: Lessons from Australia over the Past Two Decades
Peter J. Cook()
CO2CRC Ltd. & Peter Cook Centre for Carbon Capture and Storage Research, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
Abstract
Abstract  

There is widespread, though by no means universal, recognition of the importance of carbon capture and storage (CCS) as a carbon mitigation technology. However, the rate of deployment does not match what is required for global temperatures to stay well below 2?°C. Although some consider the hurdles to achieving the widespread application of CCS to be almost insurmountable, a more optimistic view is that a great deal is now known about CCS through research, demonstration, and deployment. We know how to do it; we are confident it can be done safely and effectively; we know what it costs; and we know that costs are decreasing and will continue to do so. We also know that the world will need CCS as long as countries, companies, and communities continue to use fossil fuels for energy and industrial processes. What is lacking are the necessary policy drivers, along with a technology-neutral approach to decrease carbon emissions in a cost-effective and timely manner while retaining the undoubted benefits of ready access to reliable and secure electricity and energy-intensive industrial products. In this paper, Australia is used as an example of what has been undertaken in CCS over the past 20 years, particularly in research and demonstration, but also in international collaboration. Progress in the large-scale deployment of CCS in Australia has been too slow. However, the world’s largest storage project will soon be operational in Australia as part of the Gorgon liquefied natural gas (LNG) project, and investigations are underway into several large-scale CCS Flagship program opportunities. The organization and progress of the Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Gas Technologies (CO2CRC) Otway Project, which is currently Australia’s only operational storage project, is discussed in some detail because of its relevance to the commercial deployment of CCS. The point is made that there is scope for building on this Otway activity to investigate more broadly (through the proposed Otway Stage 3 and Deep Earth Energy and Environment Programme (AusDEEP)) the role of the subsurface in carbon reduction. There are challenges ahead if CCS is to be deployed as widely as bodies such as the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) consider to be necessary. Closer international collaboration in CCS will be essential to meeting that challenge.

Keywords Carbon dioxide      Carbon capture and storage      Otway      Australia     
Corresponding Authors: Peter J. Cook   
Issue Date: 13 September 2017
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Peter J. Cook
Cite this article:   
Peter J. Cook. CCS Research Development and Deployment in a Clean Energy Future: Lessons from Australia over the Past Two Decades[J]. Engineering, 2017, 3(4): 477 -484 .
URL:  
http://engineering.org.cn/EN/10.1016/J.ENG.2017.04.014     OR     http://engineering.org.cn/EN/Y2017/V3/I4/477
References
1   International Energy Agency. 20 years of carbon capture and storage: Accelerating future deployment.Paris: International Energy Agency; 2016.
2   Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Metz B, Davidson O, de Coninck HC, Loos M, Meyer LA, editors. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
3   Finkel A, Moses K, Munro C, Effeney T, O’Kane M. Independent review into the future security of the National Electricity Market: Blueprint for the future.Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2017 Jun.
4   Bongers G,Byrom S, Constable T. Retrofitting CCS to coal: Enhancing Australia’s energy security.Melbourne: CO2CRC Ltd.; 2017.
5   Hooper B. Submissions to the independent review into the future security of the National Electricity Market. 2017. Available from: http://www.environment.gov.au/energy/national-electricity-market-review/submissions.
6   Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. Australian power generation technology report.Melbourne: CO2CRC Limited; 2016.
7   Chambers M. Gas carbon capture “cheaper” than wind and solar, experts say [Internet].Sydney: The Australian; 2017 Feb 20. Available from: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mining-energy/gas-carbon-capture-cheaper-than-wind-and-solar-experts-say/news-story/0d1a7971f3dc872192ab28baccacb1f6.
8   Cook PJ, Rigg A, Bradshaw J. Putting it back where it came from: Is geological disposal of carbon dioxide an option for Australia? APPEA J 2000;40(1):654–66
doi: 10.1071/AJ99045
9   Mac Dowell N, Fennell PS, Shah N, Maitland GC. The role of CO2 capture and utilization in mitigating climate change. Nat Clim Change 2017;7(4):243–9
doi: 10.1038/nclimate3231
10   Pour N, Webley PA, Cook PJ. A sustainability framework for bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) technologies. Energy Procedia 2017. In press
doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1741
11   Cook PJ, Causebrook R, Gale J, Michel K, Watson M. What have we learned from small-scale injection projects? Energy Procedia 2014;63:6129–40
doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.645
12   Jenkins CR, Cook PJ, Ennis-King J, Undershultz J, Boreham C, Dance T, et al.Safe storage and effective monitoring of CO2 in depleted gas fields. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109(2):E35–41
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1107255108
13   Stalker L, Boreham C, Underschultz J, Freifeld B, Perkins E, Schacht U, et al.Geochemical monitoring at the CO2CRC Otway Project: Tracer injection and reservoir fluid acquisition. Energy Procedia 2009;1(1):2119–25
doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.276
14   Underschultz J, Boreham C, Dance T, Stalker L, Freifeld B, Kirste D, et al.CO2 storage in a depleted gas field: An overview of the CO2CRC Otway Project and initial results. Int J Greenh Gas Con 2011;5(4):922–32
doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.02.009
15   Cook PJ, editor. Geologically storing carbon: Learning from the Otway Project experience.Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing; 2014.
16   Bunch M, Daniel R, Lawrence M, Browne G, Menacherry S, Dance T, et al.Multi-scale characterisation of the Paaratte Formation, Otway Basin, for CO2 injection and storage. APPEA J 2012;52(2):664
doi: 10.1071/AJ11078
17   Haese RR, LaForce T, Boreham C, Ennis-King J, Freifeld BM, Paterson L, et al.Determining residual CO2 saturation through a dissolution test—Results from the CO2CRC Otway Project. Energy Procedia 2013;37:5379–86
doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.456
18   Paterson L, Boreham C, Bunch M, Dance T, Ennis-King J, Freifeld B, et al.Overview of the CO2CRC Otway residual saturation and dissolution test. Energy Procedia 2013;37:6140–8
doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.543
19   Paterson L, Boreham C, Bunch M, Dance T, Ennis-King J, Freifeld B, et al.CO2CRC Otway Stage 2B residual saturation and dissolution test. In: Cook PJ, editor Geologically storing carbon: Learning from the Otway Project experience. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing; 2014. p. 329–60.
20   Pevzner R, Urosevic M, Caspari E, Galvin RJ, Madadi M, Dance T, et al.Feasibility of time-lapse seismic methodology for monitoring the injection of small quantities of CO2 into a saline formation, CO2CRC Otway Project. Energy Procedia 2013;37:4336–43
doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.336
21   Pevzner R, Caspari E, Gurevich B, Dance T, Cinar Y. Feasibility of CO2 plume detection using 4D seismic: CO2CRC Otway Project case study—Part 2: Detectability analysis. Geophysics 2015;80(4):B105–14
doi: 10.1190/geo2014-0460.1
22   Shulakova V, Pevzner R, Dupuis JC, Urosevic M, Tertyshnikov K, Lumley DE, et al.Burying receivers for improved time-lapse seismic repeatability: CO2CRC Otway field experiment. Geophys Prospect 2015;63(1):55–69
doi: 10.1111/1365-2478.12174
23   Boston A, Bongers G, Byrom S. Balancing flexibility whilst decarbonising electricity on the NEM.Canberra: Australian National Low Emissions Coal Research & Development; 2017.
Related
[1] Torsten Brinkmann,Jelena Lillepärg,Heiko Notzke,Jan Pohlmann,Sergey Shishatskiy,Jan Wind,Thorsten Wolff. Development of CO2 Selective Poly(Ethylene Oxide)-Based Membranes: From Laboratory to Pilot Plant Scale[J]. Engineering, 2017, 3(4): 485 -493 .
[2] Xiaobo Luo,Meihong Wang. Improving Prediction Accuracy of a Rate-Based Model of an MEA-Based Carbon Capture Process for Large-Scale Commercial Deployment[J]. Engineering, 2017, 3(2): 232 -243 .
Copyright © 2015 Higher Education Press & Engineering Sciences Press, All Rights Reserved.
Today's visits ;Accumulated visits . 京ICP备11030251号-2

 Engineering