《中国工程科学》 >> 2023年 第25卷 第1期 doi: 10.15302/J-SSCAE-2023.01.010
特大城市暴雨灾害断链推演与应对方法研究
1. 应急管理部大数据中心,北京 100013;
2. 华北科技学院计算机学院,河北廊坊 065201
下一篇 上一篇
摘要
近年来我国特大城市暴雨链生灾害频发,严重威胁人民的生命财产安全和社会稳定,采取有效应对措施及时进行断链减灾至关重要。本文深入梳理暴雨链生灾害体系,研究当前内涝灾害趋势推演模型以及各类推演模拟成果在灾害链阻断过程中的重要作用,提出模拟推演与综合响应相结合的断链思路,明确各类应急主体在特大城市巨灾应对过程中的响应策略。同时,提出以“预案”“监测”“推演”“协同”“救援”为基础的特大城市暴雨链生灾害总体应对思路,针对突发灾害场景下的多部门预案协同、多维度信息汇聚、多层级精准预警、多队伍联动调度等关键问题提出了完备综合预案体系、构建监测预警网络、提升模拟推演应用、强化联合响应能力、夯实精准救援能力五方面应对方法。并在政策法规制定、标准编制、智慧化技术应用、智能预警与定向发布技术的推广、“全民应急”新格局的形成方面提出了发展建议。
参考文献
[ 1 ]
中华人民共和国国务院. 国务院关于调整城市规模划分标准的通知 [EBOL]. 2014-10-29[2022-10-25]. http:www.gov.cngongbaocontent2014content_2779012.htm.
State Council of the PRC. Circular of the State Council on adjusting the standards for city size division [EBOL]. 2014-10-29[2022-10-25].http:www.gov.cngongbaocontent2014content_2779012.htm.
[ 2 ]
哈斯, 张继权, 佟斯琴, 等.灾害链研究进展与展望 [J].灾害学, 2016, 312: 131‒138.
Ha S, Zhang J Q, Tong S Q, et al. Progress and prospect of the research on disaster chain [J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2016, 312: 131‒138.
[ 3 ]
史培军. 三论灾害研究的理论与实践 [J].自然灾害学报, 1996, 114: 6‒17.
Shi P J. Theory on disaster science and disaster dynamics [J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 1996, 114: 6‒17.
[ 4 ]
肖盛燮, 冯玉涛, 王肇慧, 等.灾变链式阶段的演化形态特征 [J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2006, 25s1: 2629‒2633.
Xiao S X, Feng Y T, Wang Z H, et al. Shape characteristics of evolvement in chain-styled phases of disasters [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2006, 25s1: 2629‒2633.
[ 5 ]
文传甲.论大气灾害链 [J].灾害学, 1994, 93: 1‒6.
Wen C J. On atmospheric disaster chain [J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 1994, 93: 1‒6.
[ 6 ]
谢如意, 冯振鹏, 王家, 等.基于 SWMM 模型的公共建筑海绵设施应用研究 [J].给水排水, 2022, 58S1: 57‒62.
Xie R Y, Feng Z P, Wang J, et al. Application of low impact developments in public building based [J].Water Wastewater Engineering, 2022, 58S1: 57‒62.
[ 7 ]
刘志生, 李晶, 崔凯, 等.基于ArcGIS与InfoWorks的城市排水系统模拟研究 [J].中国给水排水, 2013 21: 144‒147.
Liu Z S, Ling J, Cui K, et al. Simulation of urban drainage system based on ArcGIS and InfoWorks [J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2013 21: 144‒147.
[ 8 ] Paiva R, Collischonn W, Tucci C. Large scale hydrologic and hydrodynamic modeling using limited data and a GIS based approach [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2011, 406(3‒4): 170‒181.
[ 9 ]
曾志强, 杨明祥, 雷晓辉, 等.流域河流系统水文 ‒ 水动力耦合模型研究综述 [J].中国农村水利水电, 2017 9: 72‒76.
Zeng Z Q, Yang M X, Lei X H, et al. A review of hydrological-hydrodynamic coupling models for river-basin systems [J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2017 9: 72‒76.
[10]
陈炼钢, 施勇, 钱新, 等.闸控河网水文 ‒ 水动力 ‒ 水质耦合数学模型: Ⅱ.应用 [J].水科学进展, 2014, 256: 856‒863.
Chen L G, Shi Y, Qian X, et al. Hydrology, hydrodynamics, water quality model for impounded rivers: II: Application [J]. Advances in Water Science, 2014, 256: 856‒863.
[11]
董健武.城市暴雨洪涝水动力数值模拟的研究与应用 [D].大连:大连理工大学硕士学位论文, 2018.
Dong J W. Research and application of hydrodynamic numerical simulation for urban rainstorm flood [D]. Dalian:Dalian University of TechnologyMaster´s thesis, 2018.
[12]
张文婷, 唐雯雯.基于水动力学模型的沿海城市洪水实时演进模拟 [J].吉林大学学报地球科学版, 2021, 511: 212‒221.
Zhang W T, Tang W W. Real-time flood routing simulation of coastal cities based on hydrodynamic model [J]. Journal of Jilin UniversityEarth Science Edition, 2021, 511: 212‒221.
[13]
王坤.基于MIKE11的山丘区小流域洪水淹没模拟与评价研究 [D].济南:济南大学硕士学位论文, 2018.
Wang K. Flood Submerging Simulation And Evaluation based on Mike11 in small watershed of hilly regions [D]. Ji´nan: University of JinanMaster´s thesis, 2018.
[14]
于金源.基于MIKE21水动力学模型山洪灾害评估研究 [J].东北水利水电, 2019 5: 36‒38.
Yu J Y. Study on mountain torrent disaster evaluation based on MIKE21 hydrodynamic model [J]. Water Resources Hydropower of Northeast, 2019 5: 36‒38.