Journal Home Online First Current Issue Archive For Authors Journal Information 中文版

Engineering >> 2023, Volume 26, Issue 7 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2022.11.004

Bidirectional Causality Between Immunoglobulin G N-Glycosylation and Metabolic Traits: A Mendelian Randomization Study

a Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
b Centre for Precision Health, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA 6027, Australia
c Centre for Biomedical Information Technology, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China
d School of Public Health, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan 250117, China
e School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA 6027, Australia

# These authors contributed equally to this work.

Received: 2022-05-11 Revised: 2022-10-07 Accepted: 2022-11-09 Available online: 2022-12-07

Next Previous

Abstract

Bidirectional causalityAlthough the association between immunoglobulin G (IgG) N-glycosylation and metabolic traits has been previously identified, the causal association between them remains unclear. In this work, we used Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to integrate genome-wide association studies (GWASs) and quantitative trait loci (QTLs) data in order to investigate the bidirectional causal association of IgG Nglycosylation with metabolic traits. In the forward MR analysis, 59 (including nine putatively causal glycan peaks (GPs) for body mass index (BMI) (GP1, GP6, etc.) and seven for fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (GP1, GP5, etc.)) and 15 (including five putatively causal GPs for BMI (GP2, GP11, etc.) and four for FPG (GP1, GP10, etc.)) genetically determined IgG N-glycans were identified as being associated with metabolic traits in one- and two-sample MR studies, respectively, by integrating IgG N-glycan-QTL variants with GWAS results for metabolic traits (all P < 0.05). Accordingly, in the reverse MR analysis of the integrated metabolic-QTL variants with the GWAS results for IgG N-glycosylation traits, 72 (including one putatively causal metabolic trait for GP1 (high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)) and five for GP2 (FPG, systolic blood pressure (SBP), etc.)) and four (including one putatively causal metabolic trait for GP3 (HDL-C) and one for GP9 (HDL-C)) genetically determined metabolic traits were found to be related to the risk of IgG N-glycosylation in one- and two-sample MR studies, respectively (all P < 0.05). Notably, genetically determined associations of GP11 → BMI (fixed-effects model-Beta with standard error (SE): 0.106 (0.034) and 0.010 (0.005)) and HDL-C → GP9 (fixed-effects model-Beta with SE: –0.071 (0.022) and –0.306 (0.151)) were identified in both the one- and two-sample MR settings, which were further confirmed by a meta-analysis combining the one- and two-sample MR results (fixed-effects model-Beta with 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.0109 (0.0012, 0.0207) and –0.0759 (–0.1186, –0.0332), respectively). In conclusion, the comprehensively bidirectional MR analyses provide suggestive evidence of bidirectional causality between IgG N-glycosylation and metabolic traits, possibly revealing a new richness in the biological mechanism between IgG N-glycosylation and metabolic traits.

SupplementaryMaterials

Figures

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

References

[ 1 ] Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ. The metabolic syndrome. Lancet 2005;365 (9468):1415–28. link1

[ 2 ] Bruce KD, Byrne CD. The metabolic syndrome: common origins of a multifactorial disorder. Postgrad Med J 2009;85(1009):614–21. link1

[ 3 ] Samson SL, Garber AJ. Metabolic syndrome. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2014;43(1):1–23. link1

[ 4 ] Wang X, Ping FF, Bakht S, Ling J, Hassan W. Immunometabolism features of metabolic deregulation and cancer. J Cell Mol Med 2019;23(2):694–701. link1

[ 5 ] Li X, Li X, Lin H, Fu X, Lin W, Li M, et al. Metabolic syndrome and stroke: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. J Clin Neurosci 2017;40:34–8. link1

[ 6 ] Reily C, Stewart TJ, Renfrow MB, Novak J. Glycosylation in health and disease. Nat Rev Nephrol 2019;15(6):346–66. link1

[ 7 ] Kolarich D, Lepenies B, Seeberger PH. Glycomics, glycoproteomics and the immune system. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2012;16(1–2):214–20. link1

[ 8 ] Liu D, Li Q, Zhang X, Wang H, Cao W, Li D, et al. Systematic review: immunoglobulin G N-glycans as next-generation diagnostic biomarkers for common chronic diseases. OMICS 2019;23(12):607–14. link1

[ 9 ] Kobayashi T, Ogawa K, Furukawa JI, Hanamatsu H, Hato M, Yoshinaga T, et al. Quantifying protein-specific N-glycome profiles by focused protein and immunoprecipitation glycomics. J Proteome Res 2019;18(8):3133–41. link1

[10] Biermann MH, Griffante G, Podolska MJ, Boeltz S, Stürmer J, Muñoz LE, et al. Sweet but dangerous—the role of immunoglobulin G glycosylation in autoimmunity and inflammation. Lupus 2016;25(8):934–42. link1

[11] Shade KC, Anthony RMJA. Antibody glycosylation and inflammation. Antibodies 2013;2(3):392–414. link1

[12] Liu D, Li Q, Dong J, Li D, Xu X, Xing W, et al. The association between normal BMI with central adiposity and proinflammatory potential immunoglobulin G N-glycosylation. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes 2019;12:2373–85. link1

[13] Liu D, Chu X, Wang H, Dong J, Ge SQ, Zhao ZY, et al. The changes of immunoglobulin G N-glycosylation in blood lipids and dyslipidaemia. J Transl Med 2018;16(1):235. link1

[14] Wang Y, Klaric´ L, Yu X, Thaqi K, Dong J, Novokmet M, et al. The association between glycosylation of immunoglobulin G and hypertension: a multiple ethnic cross-sectional study. Medicine 2016;95(17):e3379. link1

[15] Li X, Wang H, Russell A, Cao W, Wang X, Ge S, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with the immunoglobulin G N-glycome through putative proinflammatory mechanisms in an Australian population. OMICS 2019;23 (12):631–9. link1

[16] Lemmers RFH, Vilaj M, Urda D, Agakov F, Šimurina M, Klaric L, et al. IgG glycan patterns are associated with type 2 diabetes in independent European populations. Biochim Biophys Acta 2017;1861(9):2240–9. link1

[17] Davey Smith G, Hemani G. Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies. Hum Mol Genet 2014;23(R1): R89–98. link1

[18] Didelez V, Sheehan N. Mendelian randomization as an instrumental variable approach to causal inference. Stat Methods Med Res 2007;16(4):309–30. link1

[19] Verduijn M, Siegerink B, Jager KJ, Zoccali C, Dekker FW. Mendelian randomization: use of genetics to enable causal inference in observational studies. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010;25(5):1394–8. link1

[20] VanderWeele TJ, Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ, Cornelis M, Kraft P. Methodological challenges in mendelian randomization. Epidemiology 2014;25(3):427–35. link1

[21] Burgess S, Small DS, Thompson SG. A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization. Stat Methods Med Res 2017;26 (5):2333–55. link1

[22] Burgess S, Thompson SG, the CRP CHD Genetics Collaboration. Avoiding bias from weak instruments in Mendelian randomization studies. Int J Epidemiol 2011;40(3):755–64. link1

[23] Xu Z, Wu C, Wei P, Pan W. A powerful framework for integrating eQTL and GWAS summary data. Genetics 2017;207(3):893–902. link1

[24] Richardson TG, Zheng J, Davey Smith G, Timpson NJ, Gaunt TR, Relton CL, et al. Mendelian randomization analysis identifies CpG sites as putative mediators for genetic influences on cardiovascular disease risk. Am J Hum Genet 2017;101(4):590–602. link1

[25] Ng B, White CC, Klein HU, Sieberts SK, McCabe C, Patrick E, et al. An xQTL map integrates the genetic architecture of the human brain’s transcriptome and epigenome. Nat Neurosci 2017;20(10):1418–26. link1

[26] Hannon E, Gorrie-Stone TJ, Smart MC, Burrage J, Hughes A, Bao Y, et al. Leveraging DNA-methylation quantitative-trait loci to characterize the relationship between methylomic variation, gene expression, and complex traits. Am J Hum Genet 2018;103(5):654–65. link1

[27] Zhu Z, Zhang F, Hu H, Bakshi A, Robinson MR, Powell JE, et al. Integration of summary data from GWAS and eQTL studies predicts complex trait gene targets. Nat Genet 2016;48(5):481–7. link1

[28] Huffman JE, Knezevic A, Vitart V, Kattla J, Adamczyk B, Novokmet M, et al. Polymorphisms in B3GAT1, SLC9A9 and MGAT5 are associated with variation within the human plasma N-glycome of 3533 European adults. Hum Mol Genet 2011;20(24):5000–11. link1

[29] Klaric´ L, Tsepilov YA, Stanton CM, Mangino M, Sikka TT, Esko T, et al. Glycosylation of immunoglobulin G is regulated by a large network of genes pleiotropic with inflammatory diseases. Sci Adv 2020;6(8):eaax0301. link1

[30] Hemani G, Bowden J, Davey SG. Evaluating the potential role of pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization studies. Hum Mol Genet 2018;27(R2):R195–208. link1

[31] Verbanck M, Chen CY, Neale B, Do R. Detection of widespread horizontal pleiotropy in causal relationships inferred from Mendelian randomization between complex traits and diseases. Nat Genet 2018;50(5):693–8. link1

[32] Wang W. Glycomedicine: the current state of art. Engineering. In press.

[33] Yu X, Wang Y, Kristic J, Dong J, Chu X, Ge S, et al. Profiling IgG N-glycans as potential biomarker of chronological and biological ages: a community-based study in a Han Chinese population. Medicine 2016;95(28):e4112. link1

[34] Liu D, Xu X, Li Y, Zhang J, Zhang X, Li Q, et al. Immunoglobulin G N-glycan analysis by ultra-performance liquid chromatography. J Vis Exp 2020;155. link1

[35] Ge S, Wang Y, Song M, Li X, Yu X, Wang H, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus: integrative analysis of multiomics data for biomarker discovery. OMICS 2018;22(7):514–23. link1

[36] Das S, Forer L, Schönherr S, Sidore C, Locke AE, Kwong A, et al. Next-generation genotype imputation service and methods. Nat Genet 2016;48(10):1284–7. link1

[37] Jia J, Dou P, Gao M, Kong X, Li C, Liu Z, et al. Assessment of causal direction between gut microbiota-dependent metabolites and cardiometabolic health: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis. Diabetes 2019;68(9):1747–55. link1

[38] Gage SH, Jones HJ, Burgess S, Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Zammit S, et al. Assessing causality in associations between cannabis use and schizophrenia risk: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Psychol Med 2017;47 (5):971–80. link1

[39] Yang Q, Sanderson E, Tilling K, Borges MC, Lawlor DA. Exploring and mitigating potential bias when genetic instrumental variables are associated with multiple non-exposure traits in Mendelian randomization. Eur J Epidemiol 2022;37(7):683–700. link1

[40] Shim H, Chasman DI, Smith JD, Mora S, Ridker PM, Nickerson DA, et al. A multivariate genome-wide association analysis of 10 LDL subfractions, and their response to statin treatment, in 1868 Caucasians. PLoS One 2015;10(4): e0120758. link1

[41] Zhao Q, Chen Y, Wang J, Small DS. Powerful three-sample genome-wide design and robust statistical inference in summary-data Mendelian randomization. Int J Epidemiol 2019;48(5):1478–92. link1

[42] Liu D, Zhao Z, Wang A, Ge S, Wang H, Zhang X, et al. Ischemic stroke is associated with the pro-inflammatory potential of N-glycosylated immunoglobulin G. J Neuroinflammation 2018;15(1):123. link1

[43] Kanai M, Akiyama M, Takahashi A, Matoba N, Momozawa Y, Ikeda M, et al. Genetic analysis of quantitative traits in the Japanese population links cell types to complex human diseases. Nat Genet 2018;50(3):390–400. link1

[44] Zhou Y, Zhou B, Pache L, Chang M, Khodabakhshi AH, Tanaseichuk O, et al. Metascape provides a biologist-oriented resource for the analysis of systemslevel datasets. Nat Commun 2019;10(1):1523. link1

[45] Wang TT. IgG Fc glycosylation in human immunity. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2019;423:63–75. link1

[46] Wieser V, Adolph TE, Grander C, Grabherr F, Enrich B, Moser P, et al. Adipose type I interferon signalling protects against metabolic dysfunction. Gut 2018;67(1):157–65. link1

[47] Gudelj I, Lauc G, Pezer M. Immunoglobulin G glycosylation in aging and diseases. Cell Immunol 2018;333:65–79. link1

[48] Lu JP, Knezˇevic´ A, Wang YX, Rudan I, Campbell H, Zou ZK, et al. Screening novel biomarkers for metabolic syndrome by profiling human plasma N-glycans in Chinese Han and Croatian populations. J Proteome Res 2011;10(11):4959–69. link1

[49] Benedetti E, Pucˇic´ -Bakovic´ M, Keser T, Wahl A, Hassinen A, Yang JY, et al. Network inference from glycoproteomics data reveals new reactions in the IgG glycosylation pathway. Nat Commun 2017;8(1):1483. link1

[50] Lauc G, Huffman JE, Pucˇic´ M, Zgaga L, Adamczyk B, Muzˇinic´ A, et al. Loci associated with N-glycosylation of human immunoglobulin G show pleiotropy with autoimmune diseases and haematological cancers. PLoS Genet 2013;9(1): e1003225. link1

[51] Grandl G, Wolfrum C. Hemostasis, endothelial stress, inflammation, and the metabolic syndrome. Semin Immunopathol 2018;40(2):215–24. link1

[52] Rayyan Assi H, Ziv A, Dankner R. The metabolic syndrome and its components are differentially associated with chronic diseases in a high-risk population of 350 000 adults: a cross-sectional study. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2019;35(4): e3121. link1

[53] McCracken E, Monaghan M, Sreenivasan S. Pathophysiology of the metabolic syndrome. Clin Dermatol 2018;36(1):14–20. link1

[54] Maverakis E, Kim K, Shimoda M, Gershwin ME, Patel F, Wilken R, et al. Glycans in the immune system and The Altered Glycan Theory of Autoimmunity: a critical review. J Autoimmun 2015;57:1–13. link1

[55] Raju TS. Terminal sugars of Fc glycans influence antibody effector functions of IgGs. Curr Opin Immunol 2008;20(4):471–8. link1

[56] O’Donnell MJ, Xavier D, Liu L, Zhang H, Chin SL, Rao-Melacini P, et al.; the INTERSTROKE Investigators. Risk factors for ischaemic and intracerebral haemorrhagic stroke in 22 countries (the INTERSTROKE study): a casecontrol study. Lancet 2010;376(9735):112–23.

[57] Kifer D, Louca P, Cvetko A, Deriš H, Cindric´ A, Grallert H, et al. N-glycosylation of immunoglobulin G predicts incident hypertension. J Hypertens 2021;39 (12):2527–33. link1

[58] Ben Harouch S, Klar A, Falik Zaccai TC. INSR-related severe syndromic insulin resistance. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA,Wallace SE, Bean LJH, Gripp KW, et al., editors. GeneReviews ®. Seattle: University of Washington, Seattle; 1993.

[59] Matsuzaka T. Role of fatty acid elongase Elovl6 in the regulation of energy metabolism and pathophysiological significance in diabetes. Diabetol Int 2020;12(1):68–73. link1

[60] Liao YH, Er LK, Wu S, Ko YL, Teng MS. Functional haplotype of LIPC induces triglyceride-mediated suppression of HDL-C levels according to genome-wide association studies. Genes 2021;12(2):148. link1

[61] Li GH, Ge GM, Cheung CL, Ip P, Coghill D, Wong IC. Evaluation of causality between ADHD and Parkinson’s disease: Mendelian randomization study. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2020;37:49–63. link1

[62] Wang K, Ding L, Yang C, Hao X, Wang C. Exploring the relationship between psychiatric traits and the risk of mouth ulcers using bi-directional mendelian randomization. Front Genet 2020;11:608630. link1

Related Research